The review process for articles in the Strategic Management Perspective Quarterly includes the following steps:

Registering the article by the author in the journal system, including completing the authors' details, uploading the article according to the journal's requested format, and submitting the authors' commitment forms, conflict of interest, copyright, and similarity certificate.

Review of the article by the journal's expert, and if there are any defects, the article is returned to the author for some structural corrections (average review time less than 5 days).

If the above information is complete, the article is reviewed by the editor as follows to determine its suitability with the subject scope of the journal (average review time less than 7 days). 

A. If the editor's opinion on the above items is positive, the article is sent to the expert for similarity. 

B. If his opinion is negative, a letter of rejection of the article is sent by the editor to the author. 

C. If the article similarity percentage is in accordance with the journal's criteria, the article is sent to 2 reviewers simultaneously by the editor (the review method of articles in the journal is double-blind).

Review of the article and announcement of the opinion by the reviewers, along with completing the evaluation form and informing the editor about the quality and quantity of the article.

After completing the review, 4 cases are possible at this stage:

A. If the article is accepted by 2 reviewers and approved by the editorial board members, the article is accepted.

B. If the article is rejected by 2 reviewers, the article is removed from the journal process and the author is notified.

C. If the reviewers (at least 2 reviewers) request a review of the article, the article is returned to the authors for review and correction.

D. If the opinions of the 2 reviewers are not unanimous, the article is sent to a third reviewer.

Sending the corrected article to the final evaluator for review of the article.
Submission of the final opinion of the referees on the acceptance or rejection of the article.
Approval of the refereeing process at the journal's editorial board meeting.
If the article is rejected, the author is notified, and if accepted, it moves to the next stage (the average time frame for completing the refereeing process for articles is between 1 and 2 months).
The waiting time for articles in the print queue depends on the number of approved articles.