Strategic management attitude

Strategic management attitude

Conceptual Model of the Poverty Alleviation Policymaking Process: A Meta-Synthesis of Global Literature and Implications for Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Student in Public Administration, Faculty of Public Administration and Organizational Sciences, School of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Public policy and administration, Faculty of Public Administration and Organizational Sciences, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
A review of the literature on poverty alleviation reveals that despite a growing body of research, a coherent framework to systematically understand the interconnected factors shaping the poverty alleviation policymaking process remains largely unformulated. While valuable, existing studies tend to focus on isolated dimensions of the issue—such as social protection instruments, poverty reduction programs, distributive justice, or policy outcome evaluation—frequently overlooking the critical linkages among policy design, institutional capacity, implementation mechanisms, and evaluation frameworks. Consequently, developing an integrated understanding of the constituent components of the poverty alleviation policymaking process has become essential.
This study aims to develop a conceptual model of the poverty alleviation policymaking process through a meta-synthesis of global literature, exploring its analytical implications for Iran’s policy context. To this end, we employed a qualitative meta-synthesis methodology based on the Sandelowski and Barroso framework. Initially, a systematic search across major academic databases identified 290 English-language publications published post-2000. Following a multi-stage screening process to assess thematic relevance and methodological rigor, 42 studies were ultimately selected for in-depth analysis. Data from these selected studies were synthesized using conceptual coding and thematic aggregation.
The findings culminated in a conceptual model comprising 58 basic themes, 18 organizing themes, and 6 global themes. The identified global themes encompass: targeted poverty reduction strategies, stakeholder engagement, institutional capacities and challenges, policy effectiveness evaluation, distributive justice and sustainability, and technological and digital innovation. Our findings indicate that poverty alleviation policymaking is an inherently multidimensional process, demanding simultaneous attention to policy design, institutional capacity, implementation mechanisms, robust evaluation, and overarching considerations of justice and sustainability. While derived from a meta-synthesis of international research, the proposed model is interpreted and discussed within the specific context of Iran’s policy landscape to derive actionable and contextualized implications.
Keywords
Subjects

الوانی، سیدمهدی.، شریف‌زاده، فتاح. (1379). فرایند خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
پیری، صدیقه.، و صالح‌پور، نیوشا. (1404). فراترکیب مطالعات فقرزدایی سازمانی. فصلنامه مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، 14(2). 262-239.
الوانی، سید مهدی.، پورعزت، علی اصغر.، و نجابت، انسیه. (۱۳۹۴). بررسی دلایل اثربخش نبودن عملکرد سیستم خطمشی‌گذاری در ایران در زمینه فقرزدایی (مطالعه موردی: لایحه فقرزدایی در کشور جمهوری اسلامی ایران). فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، ۷(۱)، ۱-۱۸.
دانایی فرد، حسن.، نبوی، سیدمرتضی.، نصری، فرامرز.، و سجادی‌نژاد، سیدمحمدجواد. (1403). مفهوم‌پردازی خط‌مشی‌ها، راهبردها و برنامه‌های رفع فقر در ایران: پژوهش کیفی. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 17(65). 1-36.
دفتر حفظ و نشر آثار حضرت آیت‌الله خامنه‌ای. (۱۴۰۱). سیاست‌های کلی تأمین اجتماعی (ابلاغی مقام معظم رهبری). تهران: دفتر حفظ و نشر آثار حضرت آیت‌الله خامنه‌ای.
سالاری، علی.، زاینده‌رودی، محسن.، و اسفندآبادی، سید عبدالمجید. (1403). بررسی تحلیلی فقرچندبعدی در مناطق شهری و روستایی ایران. مطالعات سیاسی- اجتماعی تاریخ و فرهنگ ایران. 3(3)، 162-149.
سازمان برنامه و بودجه کشور. (۱۴۰۲). لایحه برنامه هفتم توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی جمهوری اسلامی ایران (۱۴۰۳-۱۴۰۷). تهران: انتشارات سازمان برنامه و بودجه.
کشتکاررجبی، هانیه.، پورعزت، علی‌اصغر.، بنافی، مسعود.، و منوریان، عباس،. (1403). ارائه الگوی خط‌مشی‌گذاری برای مبارزه با نابرابری در جمهوری اسلامی ایران: مورد مطالعه فقرزدایی و از بین بردن حاشیه‌نشینی. فصلنامه حکمرانی و توسعه، 4(3)، 209-181.
محمودی، وحید.، صمیمی‌فر، سید قاسم. (1384). فقر قابلیتی، رفاه اجتماعی، 5(17)، 32-9.
مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی. (۱۴۰۰). گزارش تحلیلی درباره خط‌مشی‌های فقرزدایی.
مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی. (۱۴۰۲). گزارش عملکرد برنامه‌های فقرزدایی.
هزارجریبی، جعفر.، و مرادی‌پور، الهام. (1403). صدای فقر همه‌گستر در جامعه؛ فراترکیب مطالعات فقر در ایران (بازه زمانی سال‌های 1390 تا 1402). فصلنامه مسائل اجتماعی ایران، 15(1)، 287-853.
 
 
 
Affandi, A., Purwaningsih, Y., Hakim, L., & Mulyaningsih, T. (2024). Interplay between poverty, poverty eradication and sustainable development: A semi-systematic literature review. Global Transitions. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2024.11.001
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
Barrientos, A. (2010). Social protection and poverty (Programme Paper). United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).
Barrientos, A., & Hulme, D. (2008). Social protection for the poor and poorest in developing countries: Reflections on a quiet revolution (Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper No. 30). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265576
Beheshti, S., Heydari, A., & Zahed, H. (2023). Pathology of poverty reduction of Imam Khomeini’s relief committee in rural areas (Case study: Beneficiaries covered in Tangestan city). Sociology of Poverty Knowledge, 13(50), Article 1901. https://doi.org/10.22108/srspi.2023.137606.1901
Chak, T., Hu, J., Xiong, J., Prashad, V., & Singh, A. (2023). China’s path from extreme poverty to socialist modernisation. Zongheng: International Journal of Contemporary Chinese Studies, (1)2.
Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789500700106
Coady, D., Grosh, M., & Hoddinott, J. (2004). Targeting of transfers in developing countries: Review of lessons and experience. World Bank.
Cornwall, A. (2000). Beneficiary, consumer, citizen: Perspectives on participation for poverty reduction (Sida Studies No. 2). Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
Eberlei, W. (Ed.). (2007). Stakeholder participation in poverty reduction (INEF Report 86/2007). Institute for Development and Peace.
Eberlei, W. (2007). Accountability in poverty reduction strategies: The role of empowerment and participation (Social Development Papers No. 104). World Bank.
Eftekhari, F., Gheisarieh, Z., Choopankareh, V., Khalili, M., & Ajdari, A. (2025). Implementing transition design for sustainable poverty alleviation in rural Iran: A case study of Aram Village, Andika County. Journal of Design Thinking. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.22059/JDT.2025.391860.1146
Esa, M. S. M., Wahid, H., & Yaacob, S. E. (2024). A systematic literature review of conditional cash transfer and behaviour changes using the ADO model. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), Article 18320. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001338
Fiszbein, A., Schady, N., Ferreira, F. H. G., Grosh, M., Keleher, N., Olinto, P., & Skoufias, E. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7352-1
Jia, S., Li, Q., Zhao, W., & Wang, Y. (2025). How do rural households achieve poverty alleviation? Identification and characterization of development pathways using explainable machine learning. Sustainability, 17(21), Article 9704. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219704
Karl, M., Potters, J., Colatei, D., & Dohrn, S. (2002). Participatory policy reform from a sustainable livelihoods perspective: Review of concepts and practical experiences. FAO/ILO.
Li, H., Shi, L., & Wen, K.-H. (2024). Design-driven sustainable poverty alleviation: A case study of precise identification and resource optimization in rural areas. Sustainability, 16(21), Article 9380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219380
Li, X., & Li, L. (2021). Evaluation of China’s targeted poverty alleviation policies: A decomposition analysis based on the poverty reduction effects. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 11691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111691
McGee, R., with Norton, A. (2000). Participation in poverty reduction strategies: A synthesis of experience with participatory approaches to policy design, implementation and monitoring (IDS Working Paper 109). Institute of Development Studies.
Mohd Zain, Z., Md Khalid, N. S., Mat Nurudin, S., & Onimisi, T. (2021). Poverty alleviation policies in Malaysia and Nigeria: A review. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 6(16), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v6i16.2694
Mustari, N., Razak, R., Junaedi, J., Fatmawati, F., Hawing, H., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Multipartner governance and the urgency of poverty alleviation policy: Zakat fundraising management. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2361529. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2361529
Mwangi, S. W., & Mutuku, M. (2025). Community participation and sustainability of poverty reduction projects in Taita Taveta County: A case of village enterprise organization projects. Scientific Journal of Business and Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v12i1.3193
OPHI & UNDP. (2025). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2025 – Overlapping hardships: Poverty and climate hazards. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative and United Nations Development Programme.
Osei-Kufuor, P., & Koomson, F. (2014). Reducing poverty through community participation: The case of the National Poverty Reduction Program in the Dangme-West district of Ghana. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 3(8), 1662–1628.
Pira, M., Fleet, G., & Moir, R. (2024). Design thinking for social change: Exploring stakeholder collaboration in poverty alleviation. Journal of Sustainability Research, 6(3), Article e240037. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20240037
Pouw, N., & Bender, K. (2022). The poverty reduction effect of social protection: The pros and cons of a multidisciplinary approach. European Journal of Development Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00505-5
Ravallion, M. (2007). Evaluating anti-poverty programs. In T. P. Schultz & J. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 4, pp. 3787–3846). Elsevier.
Ruja, I. N., Sumarmi, & Idris. (2024). Programs, opportunities, and challenges in poverty reduction: A systematic review. Sage Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241256242
Sajadi, H., Sadeghizadeh, S., & Taghizadeh, M. (2017). Poverty alleviation through empowerment with a focus on partnership: A case study of Iran. Asian Social Science, 13(5), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n5p57
Sumarto, S., Suryahadi, A., & Arifianto, A. (2004). Governance and poverty reduction: Evidence from newly decentralized Indonesia. SMERU Research Institute.
Sun, B., Whah, C. Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). A systematic review of significant research on poverty alleviation by social organizations: Comparing distinctive approaches in China and the world. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), Article 2484468.https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2484468
Türkmendağ, T., & Hassan, A. (2024). A stakeholder perspective on poverty reduction through the implementation of social marketing in the context of tourism. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1304952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1304952
UNDP Evaluation Office. (2013). Evaluation of UNDP contribution to poverty reduction. United Nations Development Programme.
van Daalen, K. R., Dada, S., James, R., Ashworth, H. C., Kizito, P., Luchters, S., Mooney, C., Kome, Y., Elsen, M. Y., & Blanchet, K. (2022). Impact of conditional and unconditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in humanitarian settings: A mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 7(1), Article e007902. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007902
Wang, Y. D., Xu, T. L., & Yuan, C. (2024). It takes three to ceilidh: Pension system and multidimensional poverty mitigation in China. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02807
Wang, Y., Firdaus, R. B. R., Xu, J., Dharejo, N., & Jun, G. (2025). China’s rural revitalization policy: A PRISMA 2020 systematic review of poverty alleviation, food security, and sustainable development initiatives. Sustainability, 17(2), Article 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020569
World Bank. (2020). Poverty and shared prosperity 2020: Reversals of fortune. World Bank.
World Bank. (2023). Poverty & equity brief: Islamic Republic of Iran. World Bank.
World Bank. (2024). Poverty, prosperity, and planet 2024: Pathways out of the polycrisis. World Bank.
World Bank. (2025a). Global economic prospects, January 2025. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2147-9
World Bank. (2025b). June 2025 update to the Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP). World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/8d28b28f-c071-40e6-91c6-f08efb411ceb/download
World Bank. (2025c). State of social protection report 2025: The 2-billion-person challenge. World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/42841
World Bank Participation and Civic Engagement Group. (2002). Participation in poverty reduction strategy papers: A retrospective study. World Bank.
Zhu, C., & Zhu, D. (2025). Precision poverty alleviation policies and macroeconomic fluctuations: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in the establishment of national-level poverty-stricken counties. International Review of Economics & Finance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104663
 

  • Receive Date 16 February 2026
  • Revise Date 29 April 2026
  • Accept Date 31 May 2026
  • First Publish Date 22 June 2026
  • Publish Date 22 June 2026