الگوی سه‌مرحله‌ای تنظیم اعتماد: چارچوبی نظری برای تاب‌آوری اجتماعی در برابر جنگ شناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری تخصصی روانشناسی صنعتی و سازمانی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.

2 نویسنده مسئول، استادیار مهندسی پزشکی، گروه فناوری‌های پزشکی، دانشکده مهندسی فناوری‌های نوین، دانشگاه تخصصی فناوری‌های نوین آمل. رایانامه: h.hassanpoor@ausmt.ac.ir

چکیده

در سال‌های اخیر، جنگ شناختی به‌عنوان یکی از تهدیدات نوظهور علیه انسجام اجتماعی و پایداری نهادهای دموکراتیک مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و تحلیل محتوای نظام‌مند، به بررسی نقش اعتماد عمومی در تقویت تاب‌آوری اجتماعی پرداخته و بر معرفی الگوی سه‌مرحله‌ای تنظیم اعتماد به‌عنوان چارچوبی نظری تمرکز دارد. داده‌ها از طریق مرور منابع پژوهشی و اسناد راهبردی منتشرشده در فاصله سال‌های ۱۹۹۰ تا ۲۰۲۴ گردآوری شدند. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که جنگ شناختی با بهره‌گیری از عملیات روانی و انتشار اطلاعات نادرست، اعتماد اجتماعی، سیاسی و سازمانی را تضعیف کرده و سرمایه اجتماعی را کاهش می‌دهد. در مقابل، اعتماد تنظیم‌شده که حاصل مداخلات هدفمند در چرخه ساخت، مدیریت و اصلاح اعتماد است، می‌تواند به بازسازی اعتماد آسیب‌دیده و ارتقای تاب‌آوری اجتماعی منجر شود. درنهایت، الگوی سه‌مرحله‌ای تنظیم اعتماد به‌عنوان ابزاری مداخله‌گرایانه برای سیاست‌گذاران پیشنهاد می‌شود که توانایی افزایش مقاومت جامعه در برابر تهدیدات شناختی و تضمین پایداری اجتماعی را دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Three-Stage Trust Regulation Model: A Framework for Social Resilience Against Cognitive Warfare

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyedmohammadjavad mousavinia 1
  • hossein Hassanpoor 2
1 PhD in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran Univercity of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Medical Technologies, Faculty of Engineering Modern Technologies, Amol University of special Modern Technologies
چکیده [English]

In recent years, cognitive warfare has emerged as a serious threat to social cohesion and the stability of democratic institutions. This study aims to examine the critical role of developing social resilience, with a particular focus on public trust, in countering the challenges posed by cognitive warfare. Employing a qualitative approach and systematic content analysis, data were collected through a review of research literature and strategic documents published between 1990 and 2024. Findings indicate that cognitive warfare, through psychological operations and the dissemination of misinformation, undermines trust at social, political, and organizational levels, thereby weakening social capital. In contrast, regulated trust—resulting from targeted interventions in the cycle of building, managing, and revising trust—contributes to the restoration of damaged trust and the strengthening of social resilience. Ultimately, the proposed three-stage trust regulation model is introduced as an intervention-oriented tool for policymakers, enhancing societal resistance to cognitive threats and ensuring social sustainability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cognitive Warfare
  • Social Resilience
  • Public Trust
  • Social Capital
  • Trust Regulation Cycle
  • Three-Stage Model

مراجع

- فائق، مجتبی، روشن، محمد، و رحیمی‌پور، غلامرضا(1403). ضرورت آمادگی نظامی همگانی از دیدگاه فقه با تأکید بر دیدگاه مراجع عظام تقلید. فصلنامه نگرش مدیریت راهبردی، 2(2)، 196-175.
- محمدی فاتح، اصغر، آروند، حمید، و جوکار، علی(1403). تأملی در بنیان‌های نظری جنگ شناختی بر اساس روش فراترکیب. فصلنامه نگرش مدیریت راهبردی، 2(4)، 118-71.
- حسن‌پور، حسین، و کاظمی، علیرضا(2023). چالش‌های اخلاقی اثرگذاری بر رفتار با استفاده از فناوری رایانه. علوم حیاتی و عرصه‌های نوپدید، 1(1)، 192-157.‌
- Adger, W. N(2006). Vulnerability. Global environmental change, 16(3), 268-281.
- Backes, O., & Swab, A(2019). Cognitive Warfare. The Russian Threat to Election Integrity in the Baltic States, Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
- Baker, A. L., Schaefer, K. E., & Hill, S. G(2019). Teamwork and communication methods and metrics for human—autonomy teaming. CCDC Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground.
- Bengtsson, M(2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus open, 2, 8-14.
- Bertsou, E(2019). Rethinking political distrust. European Political Science Review, 11(2), 213-230.
- Betkó, J., Spierings, N., Gesthuizen, M., & Scheepers, P(2022). How welfare policies can change trust–a social experiment assessing the impact of social assistance policy on political and social trust. Basic Income Studies, 17(2), 155-187.
- Bilal, A(2021). Hybrid Warfare–New Threats, Complexity, and ‘Trust’as the Antidote. Nato Review, 30(11).
- Cao, K., Glaister, S., Pena, A., Rhee, D., Rong, W., Rovalino, A., ... & Saini, J. S(2021). Countering cognitive warfare: awareness and resilience. NATO Review, 20.
- Claverie, B., & Du Cluzel, F(2022). The Cognitive Warfare Concept. Innovation Hub Sponsored by NATO Allied Command Transformation, 2.
- Claverie, B., Prébot, B., Buchler, N., & Du Cluzel, F(2022). Cognitive Warfare: The Future of Cognitive Dominance. Bruxelles: NATO Science and Technology Organization, 2022-03.
- Cole, A., Baker, J. S., & Stivas, D(2021). Trust, transparency and transnational lessons from COVID-19. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 607.
- Coleman, J. S(1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard Universit.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research designs. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
- Cutter, S. L(2003). The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 1-12.
- DeFranco, J., DiEuliis, D., & Giordano, J(2019). Redefining neuroweapons. Prism, 8(3), 48-63.
- Ehrke, F., Bruckmüller, S., & Steffens, M. C(2020). A double‐edged sword: How social diversity affects trust in representatives via perceived competence and warmth. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(7), 1540-1554.
- Fallding, H(1991). " The Consequences of Modernity". By Anthony Giddens (Book Review). Social Forces, 70(2), 529.
- Fehr, E., & Gächter, S(2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of economic perspectives, 14(3), 159-182.
- Ferrin, D. L., Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T(2007). Silence speaks volumes: the effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity-and competence-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 893.
- Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N(2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536-15545.
- Hassanpoor, H. and Hosseini, K(2020). Measuring the Impact of Cognitive Warfare on Exchange Market Using Herding Index. Defense Economics & Sustainable Development, 5(17), 73-104.
- Hosseini, S. M., & Hassanpoor, H. Designing a Dual-Process Model of Cognitive Value Warfare with an Emotional Approach in Society.
- Hoyle, A., Powell, T., Cadet, B., & van de Kuijt, J(2021, July). Influence Pathways: Mapping the Narratives and Psychological Effects of Russian COVID-19 Disinformation. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) (pp. 384-389).
- Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
- Jasinski, M. P(2011). Social trust and its origins. In Social trust, anarchy, and international conflict (pp. 47-62). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
- Jennings, W., Stoker, G., Valgarðsson, V., Devine, D., & Gaskell, J(2021). How trust, mistrust and distrust shape the governance of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(8), 1174-1196.
- Jungwirth, R., Smith, H., Willkomm, E., Savolainen, J., ALONSO, V. M., Lebrun, M., ... & Giannopoulos, G(2023). Hybrid threats: A comprehensive resilience ecosystem.
- Karlsson, M., Åström, J., & Adenskog, M(2021). Democratic innovation in times of crisis: Exploring changes in social and political trust. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 113-133.
- Kox, E. S., Siegling, L. B., & Kerstholt, J. H(2022). Trust development in military and civilian human–agent teams: the effect of social-cognitive recovery strategies. International journal of social robotics, 14(5), 1323-1338.
- Kox, E., Finlayson, N. B., Broderick-Hale, J., & Kerstholt, J(2024). Calibrated Trust as a Means to Build Societal Resilience Against Cognitive Warfare.
- Lee, J. D., & See, K. A(2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors, 46(1), 50-80.
- Lenard, P. T(2008). Trust your compatriots, but count your change: The roles of trust, mistrust and distrust in democracy. Political Studies, 56(2), 312-332.
- Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Ecker, U. K. H., Albarracín, D., Amazeen, M. A., Kendeou, P., ... & Zaragoza, M. S(2021). The Debunking Handbook 2020. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(3), 1-24.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park.
- Luhmann, N(1979). Trust and Power (John A. Wiley and Sons, Chichester).
- Masakowski, Y. R., & Blatny, J. M(2023). Mitigating and responding to cognitive warfare. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Tech. Rep.
- Mayer, R. C(1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review.
- Miller, S(2023). Cognitive warfare: an ethical analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(3), 46.
- Miller, S., & Bossomaier, T(2024). Cybersecurity, Ethics, and Collective Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
- Nasri, S. A, Hassanpoor, H, Aghaebrahimi, B. and Sepanjy, A(2023). Performance evaluation of Persian News Agency on the Twitter using a combination of Data mining, analytical network analysis (ANP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge, 7(25), 267-304.
- O'Brien, T. C., & Tyler, T. R(2019). Rebuilding trust between police & communities through procedural justice & reconciliation. Behavioral science & policy, 5(1), 35-50.
- Ognyanova, K., Lazer, D., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C(2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
- Patton, M. Q(2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation methods, 4th edn. (Thousand Oaks; London.
- Paul, C., & Matthews, M(2016). The Russian “Firehose of Falsehood” Propaganda Model: Why It Might Work and Options to Counter It. RAND Corporation.
- Putnam, R. D(2015). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In The city reader (pp. 188-196). Routledge.
- Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M(2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World politics, 58(1), 41-72.
- Schreier, M(2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J(1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
- Tully, J(2019). Trust, mistrust and distrust in diverse societies.
- Uslaner, E. M(2006). Does diversity drive down trust?.
- Uslaner, E. M. (Ed.)(2018). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford University Press.
- Van De Walle, S., & Six, F(2014). Trust and distrust as distinct concepts: Why studying distrust in institutions is important. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(2), 158-174.
- Van der Meer, T. W(2017). Political trust and the “crisis of democracy”. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics.
- Van der Meer, T. W., & Zmerli, S(2017). The deeply rooted concern with political trust. In Handbook on political trust (pp. 1-16). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Van Prooijen, J. W., Spadaro, G., & Wang, H(2022). Suspicion of institutions: How distrust and conspiracy theories deteriorate social relationships. Current opinion in psychology, 43, 65-69.
- Weymouth, R., Hartz-Karp, J., & Marinova, D(2020). Repairing political trust for practical sustainability. Sustainability, 12(17), 7055.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 19 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 07 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 29 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 دی 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 دی 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار